🔗 Share this article

Only two days prior to the NYC race for mayor, Michael Lange issued a significant electoral prediction – going beyond who would win citywide, and block by block. Lange, a political analyst who grew up in New York City, has spent over a decade in left-leaning activism and emerged as something of a well-known figure this year for his thorough analyses into city data and voter surveys.

He released his highly detailed prediction map – accurately predicting that Zohran Mamdani was victorious while missing the independent candidate’s strong performance – on his Substack, his platform. He has a flair for witty coinages. He highlighted, for instance, the divide between the “commie corridor”, stretching from Park Slope to another area to a third locale, where he forecasted (correctly) that the left-wing candidate would win by huge margins, and the “capitalist corridor” on affluent parts of Manhattan. There, “the Free Press and financial newspapers surpass the New York Times” in readership and the majority of electors leaned toward Cuomo, who ran as a moderate alternative.

Voting Day Patterns and Unexpected Results

What was your election night?

I had to do that since they were dropping around 200,000 votes into the system every few minutes! I was actually a little nervous at the beginning: Mamdani led the early vote by a dozen percentage points, but came large groups of ballots added later and his lead dropped from 12 to 8%. I was worried.

Understand, there was a world in which election day went kind of poorly for Mamdani, where Cuomo was going to end up essentially increasing his support from the earlier contest. However the winner gained half a million supporters to his initial base, and this was critical why he succeeded. He went out and massively expanded his base from the first round.

Expanding Support

Where did the mayor-elect gain those extra votes from?

He assembled the coalition that the left always wanted to build: diverse racially, youthful, tenants and individuals squeezed by affordability. He improved considerably with minority communities, everyday New Yorkers, compared to the earlier election. Plus he boosted his core of left-leaning activists, young leftists, and Muslims and south Asians. Victory required without making those significant inroads.

He created the coalition that the left long aimed for: diverse, young, tenants and people struggling with costs

There were also a number of supporters of both candidates – is this significant?

It is a genuine phenomenon, limited to Hispanic laborers, south Asians and Muslims. Voters in immigrant strongholds that went for the former president last year backed the progressive now. However I wouldn’t say he was winning over Caucasian laborers and Trump loyalists.

Turnout and Effects

One of the big stories of the election was the sky-high turnout. Who benefited?

Each candidate. Participation was much greater than I had expected. I thought it could exceed two million, but it’s closer to 2.3 million – that is a huge number of participants. Existed a substantial anti-Mamdani block, energized, but the Mamdani base was equally driven, and that sufficed to secure victory.

You predicted he’d get over half the ballots. Is he likely for that?

Right now it appears he’s favored to get over half. He’s at 50.4% but remain probably 200K ballots uncounted at that time. Thus it’s not it’s definitive, but I think probable, and I wish he does so then none can claim Sliwa was a spoiler.

GOP Decline

The GOP candidate, the Republican candidate, is the other big story. His vote plummeted.

He lost any district in any borough. Not even Tottenville in the borough, which is like an highly conservative neighborhood. That really surprised me. Cuomo kept very white areas, very wealthy areas and very religiously Jewish areas, and plus gained all of these Republicans on Staten Island with a high participation. I think occurred a lot of strategic balloting by the Republicans. This happened before Trump tweeted his support for the candidate, but it assisted. It might have changed the outcome if Mamdani’s coalition hadn’t grown.

The “Commie Corridor”

Regarding your much mentioned “commie corridor” – was support for the candidate dominant in those areas of the boroughs?

In my view there was some weakening of the progressive zone in some areas like neighborhoods that have older Caucasian residents. In Astoria, for example, the Greek landlords and homeowners supported the independent. Thus there was a little resistance. But overall, mostly the commie corridor is another huge reason why Mamdani won – he scored between 77% and 83% in specific neighborhoods.

Jewish Voters

Prior to the vote there was coverage on if the candidate was making inroads with Jewish New Yorkers. Any indication that he succeeded?

Exist neighborhoods with many non-religious and left-inclined voters – like specific locales – where he performed strongly. However in the wealthy Jewish communities such as the Manhattan area, his Middle East stance definitely mattered there. Likewise in the moderate communities including Queens neighborhoods, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they favored Cuomo. Plus, there are Jewish immigrants from the former Soviet Union in southern Brooklyn, who were strongly Cuomo. Therefore I don’t know if there were major surprises here, but Mamdani retained more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and even parts of the Upper West Side with large leads.

Long-Term Significance

Has Mamdani rewritten what New York represents in politics? Will the progressive base serve as a springboard for leftwing candidates?

Yes, it’s not accidental that some of the biggest figures from progressives come from a few areas in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I’m sure that we’ll see more of that – candidates will emerge from these neighborhoods to be elevated nationally.

However I think that every city in the US can have similar progressive hubs. Cities are the centers of leftwing power in the nation – since they’re young, tenancy is common and they represent locales where people are crushed by the inequalities exist.